Looks like squared leading points aren't enough
http://ozreport.com/19.116#2 GAP 2015 with only leading points (squared) no arrival position points:
# |
Name |
SS |
ES |
Time |
Dist.
Points
|
Lead.
Points
|
Time
Points
|
Total |
|---|
1 |
Jonny Durand |
14:20:00 |
15:40:29 |
01:20:29 |
365.9 |
40.5 |
508.4 |
915 |
2 |
Zac Majors |
14:20:00 |
15:41:06 |
01:21:06 |
365.9 |
26.9 |
486.6 |
879 |
3 |
Rob Burgis |
14:00:00 |
15:32:19 |
01:32:19 |
365.9 |
107.8 |
352.2 |
826 |
http://stayoff.homenet.org:8100/gap/2015woarrival.html
Unlike the default GAP 2015 with both leading and arrival position points, Rob
doesn't pass Zac and take 2nd place. Not only are the arrival position points
transferred to the speed points, but the speed points are more valuable. Jonny
gets 915 instead of 894. Rob clearly led all the way and got to goal almost nine minutes ahead of Zac and
Jonny. But leading points needed arrival position points to put him into second
place. Of course, as I wrote previously, why exactly should Rob be rewarded so
handsomely for taking the early clock? Zippy flew much faster than he. Was Rob
somehow disadvantaged and Zippy and Jonny advantaged because Rob took an earlier
clock?
http://OzReport.com/1434114823
|
