My article on the DHV monopoly in Germany has caused a bit of a stir (that's why I write articles, after all). I thought that I would follow it up with some suggestions as to how the DHV could get back in my (and others) good graces.

First, engage in a real dialog with the hang gliding manufacturers (and listen very closely to them) regarding the proper testing procedures and then adopt the "consensus" procedures. Contact Steve Pearson and Mike Meier at Wills Wing, Scott Barrett at Airborne, Gerolf Heinrichs at Moyes, Tomas Pellicci at Ikarus, and the designers at Icaro and Aeros and form a workgroup of these gentlemen. Ask them to produce a document that states the changes that they want to see in the certification process at the DHV. Follow their recommendations and change the procedures as they have detailed.

This was essentially the process engaged in by the US FAA and the manufacturers of Light Sport Aircraft in the US. The FAA relied on the manufacturers to set the standards for LSA and for the certification procedures. The FAA figured rightly that the expertise was in the heads of the designers and builders of these aircraft and that they should rely on them to set the standards. They oversaw the process so that it was legitimate and fair to all.

Second, ask this group what should be done regarding sprog measurements in competition. Whether the whole idea should be dropped, or procedures changed, or just what makes sense from a technical point of view. Report the results to CIVL.

Third, retract this article http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=16154 (from Charlie Joest, DHV President, in his capacity at EHGPU President) and engage in a dialog with hang gliding pilots around the world regarding safety matters (through the Oz Report and other venues).

Fourth, accept certification from the BHPA and the HGMA as equivalent to DHV certification.

Fifth, enhance democratic decision making within the DHV.